An on-line community devoted to advancing the understanding and practice of technical management and leadership.

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
What's Going On Here PDF Print E-mail
Written by Paul Williams   
Monday, 12 March 2007

Almost every time I log onto Geekleaders.com my eye is drawn to the poll on the right side of the home page, the poll that asks if you think you could do a better job than your boss.  The numbers shown in the results to date are very interesting to me. 

Almost a third of the respondents are neutral on the question.  That means, I guess, they don't know the answer, don't care or could go either way.  Of these, I think only the first is a legitimate response.  If you don't know it's possibly because you think your boss is doing o.k. and is exposed to pressures, circumstances or information you're not aware of - you're giving him or her the benefit of the doubt.  If you don't care, then why are you reading a leadership website in the first place or responding to a question like that posed in the poll?  If you could go either way, then you have a thought on the question but aren't willing to state it for some reason.  That's like not voting in an election - by not voting you've in effect voted for the winner and have no claim on being able to complain later. 

 

The numbers I find most interesting, though, are those that do show a definite opinion on whether or not the respondent could do a better job than his or her boss.  I am neither a leadership guru nor a statistician, but I find the numbers startling.  Only about 22% of the respondents find their bosses are doing o.k. to well, while almost half (just less than 47%) think they could do better than their boss to some degree.  This begs the question of why and the further question of what (if anything) can be done about that.  The leadership ethos in those organizations is at least slightly off of what it could be and could even be dysfunctional.

 

Admittedly, the total number of responses is not high in the big picture of things and may not even be fully representative of the GeekLeader readership group. To the experts in such things as this poll shows, and again I'm not one of those, the numbers may not be surprising.  But I assume that most readers of GeekLeader.com are in some kind of leadership role in their organizations.  To say that almost half of those who responded (and maybe more, if you count some of the ‘neutrals') think they could do a better job than their boss does not speak well for the goal we all have of trying to provide the most effective and concerted leadership and leadership models we can for our staff members.  

 

Perhaps I'm missing something or making too much of something that's not really there.  I would be interested in your thoughts on the poll, in any case.


Paul Williams has recently retired after 40+ years in IT, although in truth much of that time was spent in EDP, MIS and IS before he became an IT'er.  Most of his career has been in IT management, where he enjoyed several stints as a CIO for different insurance companies on the West Coast.  While at the same time doing some "real work" in IT, for the last five years Paul has specialized in developing and facilitating leadership  programs both for his division and for the company at large.  He doesn't think of himself as a technical person but rather as a business person with some technical skills. 

  
Comments (1) >> feed
Maybe It's Just a Poor Question
written by Wayne Mack, March 19, 2007

SUrveys are notoriously hard to do. One key indication that a survey question is inneffective is that in analyzing the results one finds himself trying to intepret why people really answered as they did.

This question is particularly hard to interpret because it requires the comparison of two unknowns; how skilled is the responder and how skilled is the responder's boss. It also appears that it is a question that people will either feel neutral about or feel strongly in the negative; i.e., feel their boss is ineffective. This emotional component is going to bias the survey strongly towards those who are going to answer in the negative. I find it really surprising that as many as responded in a neutral fashion. The result is that it should be expected that respondents will self select and mostly those with a negative opinion of their boss would answer.

I suspect that the survey results reflect more on the quality of the question than anything about the population at large.


Write comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.


busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 13 March 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Weekly Webinar Program Information