|
Doubt plays an
important role for client advisors who build long-term relationships. There are
three types of doubt you need to cultivate.
|
Editor's Note:
Andrew Sobel helps professional service firms with client relationships.
He graciously allowed me to share some of his articles here since I
thought that many of his insights would apply to Geek Leaders as well.
|
"I
used to work for an old-fashioned rainmaker," a client of mine once told me.
"He had that ‘take no prisoners' approach to sales and customer relationships.
His motto was, ‘Sometimes wrong, never in doubt.'" Never in doubt, indeed. It's
one thing to have deep-seated conviction about your views, quite another,
however, to obscure the truth with overconfidence and bluster-something that
clients today simply won't put up with.
Doubt, in fact, plays an
important role for client advisors who build long-term relationships. There are
three types of doubt you need to cultivate:
-
External
doubt: skepticism that the problem your client presents to you is the real
problem and that what your clients tell you about their business is really
true. Also, having a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom;
-
Internal
doubt: the ability to step back and recognize that you may be wrong about
something or that your fundamental premises need rethinking;
-
Doubt about
outcomes: the willingness to suspend judgment about what's "good" and
"bad"-about events whose eventual consequences we in fact don't understand.
First,
great client advisors are bit skeptical about what clients tell them. They
watch clients' feet, not their mouths. They are convinced by observable
behavior and data, not by mere words. Client advisors, metaphorically, all come
from Missouri-the
"Show Me" state.
In the early 1980s, the London financial markets
were deregulated. Whereas previously there had been a strict separation of
investment banking (securities underwriting and issuance) and broking
(distribution and trading), these walls were now removed. It became
conventional wisdom that every
merchant bank would have to rush into stockbroking in order to hold onto its
market share and client base. When Schroders, one of the top three merchant
banks at the time, hired James Kelly as its advisor, they expected to receive
similar advice-the question was really how to implement this shift. Kelly, in fact,
who had deep experience in the US
financial markets, thought it would be suicide for Schroders to plunge into a
trading business they knew nothing about. Rejecting the accepted wisdom, he
convinced Schroders to remain independent and focus on its core
strengths-investment banking, M&A, and fund management.
One by one its competitors tried to
become full-service banks, and one by one they stumbled and were picked off by
larger institutions at bargain prices. Schroders prospered enormously, and 16
years later its market value had increased more than 25-fold. At the peak of
the market, it sold its vaunted investment banking business to Citigroup, where
it continues to prosper (the fund management side remained independent). Kelly,
who founded and was CEO of a major consulting firm, says, "You have to be
skeptical when you see the herd thundering in one direction. You just have to
doubt whether it makes sense for your client."
I've heard all of these phrases
many times before:
"We have the best quality in the
business."
"Our management team is second to
none."
"We have the lowest employee
attrition in our industry."
"Our competitor's products use
inferior/outdated/incompatible technology."
"We've already implemented that"
[whatever it is you're suggesting to them]
"Our brand is one of our most
valuable assets."
"We have no need for your
services."
Your job is to politely
question and challenge statements like this. Ask for evidence that they are
true. Through direct enquiry, find out for yourself.
The flip side of doubting your
client's assertions or rejecting accepted wisdom is questioning your own
premises. One of the traps that experts fall into is a blind belief in their
expertise. Many governmental and corporate blunders, in fact-from the
Iran-Contra scandal of the 1980s to the dot-com meltdown of the late 1990s-can
be traced to this type of hubris.
My brother, a prominent
surgeon, told me this story about the dangers of a lack of doubt: "A patient at
my hospital had suffered a brain injury, and it was determined that he was
essentially ‘brain dead'-according to his doctors, there was no hope whatsoever
of recovery. He would never, ever, regain consciousness. The family, ever
hopeful, refused to allow life support to be removed. For months, the man lay
in a vegetative coma. One day, a nurse was brushing his teeth, and he suddenly
blurted out, ‘Leave me alone!' He did something that was considered a medical
impossibility by the experts." The patient, sadly, later passed away, but not
before confounding the entire hospital staff.
I recall a client in Italy who had asked a major consulting firm to
evaluate a proposal to open several bank branches in Milan. The firm had extensive experience in
the banking industry, and had developed a sophisticated model for determining
branch profitability. The model, in essence, showed that you became profitable
by clustering your branches in one geographic location, rather than dispersing
them. They told my client, in no uncertain terms, that to open just a few
branches in the north of Italy
would be a disaster. Instead, they, said, he should concentrate new branches
near his existing ones in central Italy. Against the consultants'
advice, the client opened the Milan
branches, and they were a huge success. I won't go into all the reasons why
they worked out so well-but needless to say the consultants had applied a
business model that had worked in many other countries, notably the United States,
without understanding this client's particular context and business
environment. They refused to entertain any doubts about their stock advice, and
left behind one very dissatisfied client.
The third type of doubt you need to
exercise is about outcomes. In the
West, we are very certain that some things are good for us and others are bad.
A competitor comes out with a similar product or service to one that we
offer-terrible! We are audited by the IRS-horrendous! Someone threatens to sue
us-heinous! On the other hand, we are sure other events are good. We get
offered a promotion, for example, or better yet, win the lottery. What great
fortune, everyone will say. Zen philosophy, in contrast, espouses a more
neutral attitude towards the world around us. It encourages us to doubt our
preconceived notions about events being either favorable or unfavorable.
So when a competing product is
introduced, why are we so sure that it's a bad thing? Perhaps it will stimulate
the market and create renewed demand for our own product; or the competition
will spur our organization towards greater innovation, resulting in increased
profits down the road. So you've won the lottery? You should read the studies
that have been done of lottery winners-for many of them, winning the lottery
ruins their lives! Bernie Marcus was fired
from K-Mart, and he promptly went out and co-founded Home Depot-he's now a
billionaire.
This principle is beautifully
illustrated in a short story entitled "The Verger," written by W. Somerset Maugham.
In the story, a man named Albert has been the verger (a lay caretaker) at a
small church for 16 years. One day a new vicar arrives at the church, and,
discovering that Albert cannot read or write, fires him. Feeling depressed and
destitute as he walks along the street near the church, Albert notices that
there are no shops nearby, and decides to start a small kiosk selling tobacco
and candy. He proves to be quite adept at business, and in a short period of
time he ends up owning a whole chain of kiosks and shops. Years later, Albert
has become a very wealthy man. One day he goes to the local bank to make a
large deposit, and asks the bank manager for assistance, casually explaining
that he cannot read or write. Hearing his story, the manager exclaims in
astonishment, "Good
God, man, what would you be now if you had been able to?"
"I can tell you that, sir," replies Albert. "I'd be verger of St.
Peter's, Neville Square."
So don't be so sure that an outcome is good or
bad for your client-or for yourself. Things may not turn out to be as bad-or as
good-as you think they will. The next time a client turns you down, don't wring
your hands and mope around the house; it's not the end of the world, and
another door will probably open for you.
Correspondingly, when you win a big assignment or your client scores a
victory, celebrate but don't think all your challenges are over-you and I both
know they aren't!
Great client advisors, in summary,
strike a healthy balance between acting with a deep-seated conviction that is
founded on a set of time-tested principles, and expressing healthy doubt about
their clients'assertions and their own views.
There is an old Zen
saying, "Small doubt, small enlightenment; great doubt, great enlightenment."
Cultivate the doubting mind-it will become an important part of the wisdom you
offer to your clients.
Andrew
Sobel is a leading authority on client relationships and the skills and
strategies required to earn enduring client loyalty. He is a consultant and
educator to major services firms worldwide. Andrew is the author of the
business bestsellers Making Rain: The
Secrets of Building Lifelong Client Loyalty (John Wiley & Sons), and Clients for Life: How Great Professionals
Develop Breakthrough Relationships
(Simon & Schuster/Fireside). He can be reached at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
| Comments () >> |
 |
| Write comment |
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet. |
|