Management in professional firms suffers from (at least) five problems.
First, the job of a practice manager (how he or she adds value and makes a
difference) is ambiguous and not well understood. Second, firms frequently use
the wrong criteria in selecting practice managers. Third, few professional firm
managers (at any level) receive training in how to manage people. Fourth,
practice managers are evaluated and rewarded based on the wrong set of
behaviors, creating perverse incentives. Finally, and most important,
management, if it is not to be arbitrary, requires the existence and acceptance
of common standards. This vital commitment is often missing in professional
firms.
|
Editor's Note:
David Maister is one of the world's leading experts on the management of professional services.
He graciously allowed me to share some of his articles here since I believe that technical groups are very similar to professional service firms.
|
(Portions of this article are based on my books Practice What You Preach
(2001) and First Among Equals
(2002). The latter book was coauthored
with Patrick McKenna, to whom thanks are due.)
I received a call from the partner in charge of practice development at a
major New York-based
professional firm. "We are trying to get more of our partners actively involved
in marketing," he said. "Our question is how to motivate partners to do this."
"You motivate partners, like all human beings, one at a time." I said.
"Someone needs to sit down, informally, with each partner to find out what kind
of practice each individual wants to have, say, three years from now, and then
actively help that person figure out how to bring that desired, personal future
about, preferably by assisting them with first steps."
"Who in the firm should do that?" he asked. "Well," I replied, "the logical
candidates would be the practice group leaders." "I'm not sure that they see
that as their role right now," he said, "and I'm not sure they know how to do
what you describe." "I'm not surprised," I replied. "Few practice group leaders
do."
Management in professional firms suffers from (at least) five problems.
First, the job of a practice manager (how he or she adds value and makes a
difference) is ambiguous and not well understood. Second, firms frequently use
the wrong criteria in selecting practice managers. Third, few professional firm
managers (at any level) receive training in how to manage people. Fourth,
practice managers are evaluated and rewarded based on the wrong set of
behaviors, creating perverse incentives. Finally, and most important,
management, if it is not to be arbitrary, requires the existence and acceptance
of common standards. This vital commitment is often missing in professional
firms.
Traditional Approaches
Professional firms tend to be very well administered. Administrative topics
such as financial controls, cash-flow management, billable hour targets,
receivables control and the like are in place almost everywhere and are
deployed to great effect. However, all this is about managing money. Little or
none of it is about managing people, who remain largely unmanaged at all levels
of the firm.
Consider, for example, the way many (if not most) professional firms do go
about motivating people to get involved in marketing, the topic about which I
was asked. Typically, this motivation is accomplished simply by announcing that
those who bring in business will be rewarded. And that's it! They just say, "Do
it and we'll pay you!"
This is, at best, a somewhat limited view of human motivation, especially
among bright, educated people. It mostly succeeds in rewarding those who were
going to do it anyway and were already skilled at doing it. It does not do a
good job of engaging people who start off weak at marketing, or who are scared
of it or uninterested in it.
An alternate approach often taken is to hire an outside speaker or training
firm to "convince" partners of the importance of practice development and to
give them some techniques for doing it. One-on-one this might have some chance
of success, but offered in the mass (as it so often is) rarely will it make a
lasting impact.
Why People Don't Participate
The "give them a speech and training program" approach fails to recognize
that before you can get someone to do something they are not doing, you first
must understand why they (as individuals) are not doing it. Among the possible
reasons why people don't get involved in marketing (or associate supervision or
anything else the firm wants them to do) are the following:
- The individual doesn't
understand the action's importance.
- The individuals see the
action's importance to the firm, but don't see what's in it for them
personally.
- The individual doesn't know
how to do the action or some aspect of the action.
- The individual knows what to
do but is just not very skilled at it.
- The individual doesn't want
to do it. They'd rather stick to their technical discipline.
- The individual has lost his
or her enthusiasm for innovation and are in an "I'll just do my job" mode.
- The individual hasn't been
given the support or tools to do the action.
- The individual thinks the
firm (in spite of its exhortations) really wants them to be billable only
and not to engage in nonreimbursed activities.
- The action is viewed as
discretionary; the individual thinks that participation is optional.
- The individual views the
activity as a long-term investment, and they'd rather work on things that
provide more immediate gratification.
- The individual feels more
accountability and pressure for other things; they intend to do or would
like to do the action, but they feel that they don't have the time to do
it.
- The individuals feel that the
action is not "valued" by their peers: the corporate culture doesn't
reinforce the action.
- The individual views the
action as a personal choice and is not thinking of team-level impacts (or
approaches).
- The individual perceives the
reward for the activity, but thinks it will only be given for high levels
of performance - so why should a beginner even try?
- Perhaps most important of
all: When the individual doesn't do it, no one reacts (except perhaps once
a year at performance evaluation time). Since there are no short-term
consequences for noncompliance, why bother when there is so much else to
do?
The list is incomplete, but the key point is clear: there are myriad reasons
why people don't engage in various initiatives like client service and other
aspects of client relations, knowledge management, associate training,
teamwork, and a host of other supposedly strategic behaviors. Getting an
individual to change and participate will require a sophisticated ability to
engage in a nonthreatening conversation with each individual in order to
uncover (and respond to) the true reasons for nonparticipation.
How to Influence People
If enthusiastic participation in these various endeavors is to be obtained
even from the weakest and most reluctant, what will be needed is a process that
has the following characteristics:
- It will involve informal,
confidential meetings between each individual and someone they trust
(ideally, the practice group leader). It will be essential that the group
leader be perceived by the individual as trying to help him, not, as is
all too common, acting as a representative of upper management, policing
the individual. ("Why did you miss your billable hour target?")
- Whatever behavior the group leader
wants the individual to exhibit, the group leader must be able to
convincingly convey why it is in the individual's interests to pursue it.
(The leader must answer the question "What's in it for me?") Appeals to do
things because they help the firm (i.e., exhortations to citizenship) are
notoriously ineffective in getting people to change.
- The proposed change in
behavior must be incremental, with small and definite target
accomplishments and specific, short-term deadlines. ("How about committing
to writing one article in the next three months? Do you think you could do
that?") People participate in change if they can see a realistic chance
for an early success. Large, transformational targets ("You need to
generate $1 million of business") tend to demotivate, not encourage. (The
employee concludes "There's no way I can do that. It's just not me.")
Naturally, each first challenge must be customized to the talents and
enthusiasms of each individual, not arbitrarily imposed on all group
members.
- The practice group leader
must drop by to visit each individual to help with any roadblocks and to
provide further encouragement. The group leader needs to convey the
seriousness of meeting the commitments made ("You must keep your word.
Don't attempt or promise things you are unsure about completing. It's
better to deliver on something smaller than to fail to deliver on a bigger
promise.").
There is nothing magical about this process. It is based on fundamental
truths about helping another human being improve, and applies to parenting,
weight loss, sports team coaching or any other human endeavor.
The Managed Professional Firm
Let's try and imagine what a professional firm that applied these principles
might look like. Imagine a firm where the following statements were true:
- Group members receive
effective coaching to help them succeed, not just demands that they do so
(or rewards if they can figure out how to do so).
- Practice groups function
effectively as well-coordinated teams, helping each other.
- Members of practice groups
have a clear understanding of their rights and obligations as group
members and how they are expected to function together.
- Members of the group know why
their group exists, where it is going, what it is trying to accomplish and
what its core priorities are.
- Group members honor their
commitments to each other and can rely on other group members to do what
they said they would do.
- Group members share their
collective wins and losses with each other, honoring and recognizing each
other's efforts and contributions.
- Group members help each other
succeed and grow, and then share in the excitement of each other's
accomplishments.
- Group members hold each other
to high standards of performance and provide each other with honest
feedback, coaching and compassion.
- Group members believe they
are recognized for contributing to the team purpose, and act accordingly.
- Group leaders have high
levels of interpersonal skill in coaching, influencing and motivating
others.
- Group leaders are trained in
how to be effective coaches (or managers or leaders).
- In evaluating and rewarding
group leaders, the performance of their group carries more weight than
individual, personal performance.
It should be self-evident that, in such an environment, more would be
accomplished. Individuals would fulfill more of their potential, and true
collaboration and teamwork would lead to greater accomplishment than the sum of
individual efforts. It should also be clear that, except for the most
individualistic of partners, this would be a more pleasant and harmonious work
environment. Why, then, do so many firms fail to achieve this state?
Basic Agreements Needed
In the typical professional firm, the barriers to attaining this environment
are not trivial. They do not involve mechanics, but fundamental philosophies. A
managed professional firm requires firm wide agreement among the partners on
some key principles:
- Partners need to agree to be
coached and to give up some degree of their autonomy; they cannot behave
only as they see fit.
- There must be an agreement,
up front, as to what shared values and standards of behavior the practice
group leader is empowered to coach on the basis of. (If the firm does not
put into place certain standards and communicate certain values that are
expected of the entire firm, a practice group leader will probably fail to
get individual partners to espouse them.)
- Partners must agree to
function as team members, accepting the discipline and obligations that
come as a part of team membership.
- Practice group leaders must
accept responsibility for the group's performance, and must be willing to
devote whatever time becomes necessary to help the individuals within the
team and the team as a whole.
- Partners and the firm's
executive and compensation committees must agree, in advance, that a
practice group leader's evaluation will be based primarily on the group
results and not on that individual's personal statistics.
- Finally, the executive and
compensation committees must, through their decisions, reinforce the
requirement for team collaboration by partners.
These are significant firmwide agreements that will not be obtained lightly.
They must be discussed, debated and formally made part of the firm's
constitution before a managed firm can function effectively.
Take one example: Suppose the firm has concluded that greater success can be
achieved by living to a standard of excellence in associate supervision.
Imagine further that this has been left at the level of a "strategic
initiative" rather than as a requirement affecting all partners. The group
leader sees that someone is "competent" in this area but is not pursuing
excellence.
The group leader decides to visit the individual to help. If there is not
consensus in advance that excellence is a firmwide standard, she can (and
probably will) reply, "I'm not messing up in this area; leave me alone. I've
got more important things to worry about!" At this point, the group leader can
do nothing. It is too late to debate the principle.
If, on the other hand, the partner accepts the principle and responds with
"Yeah, you're right, it's important. But I'm having difficulty getting it
done," then the group leader can switch into help mode. The rule is simple: If
the standards are agreed to, the group leader can deal with performance issues
in a nurturing fashion. If the standards are not agreed to, the group leader
cannot function. So, how clear are the standards of behavior that partners must
adhere to in your firm?
Essential to the functioning of any group is agreement in three areas:
- Mutual accountability. All
group members must hold one another accountable for individual and group
performance.
- Shared contribution. All
group members must have an opportunity and the obligation to contribute.
- Shared values. All group
members must adhere strictly to the values, principles and standards
established by the group.
If the firm has not established these agreements, it is mandatory that the
group leader take his or her partners through a discussion that establishes
them for the group. Only when points of consensus are established can the group
leader hope to have influence.
Characteristics of an Effective Manager
The job of a manager is to help the people in his or her group achieve more
than they would if left on their own. The manager must cajole, nurture,
challenge and inspire each group member to stretch for achievement. Beyond this
(and what is much harder), the manager must get the individuals to function as
a team.
What is often overlooked, especially in professional firms that prize
intellect, is that the job of management has almost nothing to do with
intelligence, rationality, logic or IQ. The job is almost entirely about the
ability to influence other people's emotions: to create energy, excitement,
enthusiasm, passion and engagement. The key requirement for the job is not the
knowledge of what to do but the ability to get others to do it, to participate
willingly and enthusiastically.
Unfortunately, this is not the basis on which managers are usually chosen in
professional firms. People are promoted to department head, office head or
higher firm management based on their technical skills, business development
abilities or financial orientation. While it is critical that a firm possess
significant amounts of these talents, none of them is a qualification for
effective management.
Management As A Social Skill
Management is inherently a social skill, an interpersonal ability and one
requiring large amounts of what today is called "emotional intelligence." The
job of a manager is to get others turned on. Note that this requires that the
manager have his or her ego under control: he or she must be content to focus
on helping others do the work and receive the glory. A manager who needs to do
everything herself may be a great practitioner, but will be an ineffective
manager.
In my book Practice What You Preach, I was able to demonstrate that
managers achieving higher financial returns showed certain characteristics:
They were seen by their people as being:
- Even-keeled and
even-tempered.
- Genuine.
- Good at reading people's
characters and skill levels.
- Sensitive to personal issues.
- Someone of high integrity.
- Apolitical.
- Sincere.
- A good listener.
- Accessible.
- Comfortable with allowing
other people to get (and take) credit.
- Disciplined about standards,
though open to reasons why they may not be met.
- Enthusiastic.
- Studied and precise in
conversations.
- Thoughtful.
How many managers at any level are today chosen based on how well they
embody these characteristics?
What a Good Manager Does
The only management worthy of the name is one-on-one. Everything else is
window dressing. You don't excite people by giving speeches or posting mission
statements on the wall. Again, Practice What You Preach provided some
statistically-validated answers. To achieve superior financial returns,
managers must
- Act as if not trying is the
only sin.
- Act as if they want everyone
to succeed.
- Actively help people with
their personal development.
- Always do what they say they
are going to do.
- Believe in, and keep the
faith with, what they are doing.
- Do what is right, over the
long term, for clients and for their people.
- Facilitate, not dictate.
- Give credit where credit is
due.
- Manage people in the way that
works for each individual, not just in they way they want to manage. Good
managers don't have to be chameleons, just adaptable.
- Deliver bad news in a
nonthreatening, nonupsetting way.
- Remember what people tell
them.
- Understand what drives
individual people.
- Respect confidences.
- Show enthusiasm and drive.
- Take work seriously-not
themselves seriously.
- Walk the halls and know all
the people.
- Let people know them as human
beings, not just as managers.
A common reply I hear to lists like this is: "But they didn't teach us this
in professional school!" No, they didn't, and-perhaps surprisingly-they don't
teach it in business school either. But that's no excuse, for any of us, for
not working at developing these skills.
Managers in professional firms, like managers everywhere, are almost
entirely untrained in managing. They may receive training in business, but
that's a different subject. Whether in a small firm or large, how many
professional firm managers know how to stop a prima donna from demotivating the
rest of the team?
How many know how to get people to stretch for excellence and not settle for
competence? How many know how to suppress turf battles and get different
partners to function like real teams because "that's how we do it around here"?
The answer, of course, is that there are some true "naturals" as managers
out there. They can pull all that off and more. But if you're not a natural,
there's nothing the firm provides to help you learn it.
Getting the Incentives Right
Finally, evaluation and reward systems for managers in professional firms
are often dysfunctional. There's one logical way to evaluate and reward
managers: since their job is to promote the success of their group, they should
be evaluated and rewarded on whether their group has raised its performance.
Unfortunately, it is still true in many firms that group heads are given
individual, personal targets for utilization and/or business generation.
Accordingly, whenever there's a trade-off between meeting their personal
targets and helping the group (and, of course, given the limited number of hours
in a day, there's always a trade-off), those managers worry about their
personal numbers first and the group performance second.
It's not difficult to see that this is the wrong choice. Fewer personal
billed hours by the group leader is a loss, but it's miniscule compared to the
benefit of raising the group's performance by even a small amount. The group
contains many people (let's say ten for illustration), and raising their
contribution by, say, 10 percent each would represent a 100 percent improvement.
The group leader could only make an equivalent individual improvement by
doubling his or her own performance. Why not manage instead?
Have no doubt about it: if you do not manage your professional firm,
individuals will achieve less of their potential, your teams will function less
well and your strategic initiatives will be implemented only sporadically.
Again, why not manage?
David Maister is widely acknowledged as one of the world’s leading
authorities on the management of professional service firms. He is the author or co-author of numerous books including "Managing the Professional Service Firm," "True Professionalism" and "The Trusted Advisor." He can be reached at David[at]DavidMaister[dot]com. A pdf of this article can be downloaded from his site at http://davidmaister.com/pdf/managemetnwhatitreallytakes.pdf. Copyright, David Maister.
| Comments () >> |
 |
| Write comment |
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet. |
|